Russ Allbery writes: > Michael T Babcock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Considering the number of useful patches that aren't part of the qmail > > distribution that the average qmail admin seems to be using, I disagree. > > I disagree with the contention that the *average* qmail admin is using any > patches at all, if by average you mean the mode, and possibly even the > median. I agree with Russ. I have never felt the need to install or even consider a patch to the main Qmail code. I feel that there is a small minority of list members who cannot resist trying every third-party patch that comes along without understanding how it will *break* Qmail. Then they complain about broken behavior caused by ill-considered patches. /Joe
- Re: Unable to check e-mail.... Bolivar Diaz
- Re: Unable to check e-mail.... Steffan Hoeke
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relaying! Frank D. Cringle
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relaying! Adam McKenna
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relaying! Michael T. Babcock
- Re: remote load management, was orbs.org nonsense John R. Levine
- Re: remote load management, was orbs.org nonsense Michael T. Babcock
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relaying! Russ Allbery
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relaying! Michael T. Babcock
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relaying! Russ Allbery
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relaying! Joe Kelsey
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relaying! David Dyer-Bennet
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relaying! Michael T. Babcock
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relaying! Nathan J. Mehl
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relaying! Michael T. Babcock
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relaying! Paul Jarc
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relaying! Dave Sill
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relaying! Michael T. Babcock
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relaying! Vince Vielhaber
- Re: licensing Michael T. Babcock
- Re: licensing Vince Vielhaber
