CUCIpop is pretty decent, I've used it before.
Observations:
1) It's not actively developed (the most current version was released
sometime in '98)
2) It doesn't compile cleanly on some platforms without disabling
significant features (Solaris 2.6 and 7)
3) It *may* be just as insecure as qpopper -- just because there are no
working exploits out doesn't mean the code is secure. It might just not be
popular enough to warrant significant attention from crackers.
4) It's not totally free. If I remember correctly, the license requires
some sort of homage or payment to the author to use it legally unless you are
non-profit/etc.
That being said, it is a nice, fast and stable POP3 implementation.
--Adam
On Wed, May 24, 2000 at 05:07:08PM -0400, vogelke wrote:
> >> On Wed, 24 May 2000 13:33:11 -0600 (MDT),
> >> John Gonzalez/netMDC admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> N> Are there any known exploits for 2.1b1?
>
> CUCIpop has been mentioned on this list before; small, fast, some
> nifty features, and I don't remember seeing any security warnings
> about it.
>
> ftp://ftp.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/pub/packages/cucipop/
>
> --
> Karl Vogel
> ASC/YCOA, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH 45433, USA
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Instead of getting married again, I'm going to find a
> woman I don't like and give her a house. --Lewis Grizzard
>
