On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 08:56:41PM +0100,
Magnus Bodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yes, according to RFC 2142. <http://rfc2142.x42.com/>
>
> But as qmail is bouncing in the name of mailer-daemon, it would be nice to
> implement that too.
The envelope sender address is set to the empty address even though
MAILER-DAEMON is used in the from header. It is debateable whether or
not adding an alias for MAILER-DAEMON is useful. Double bounce replies shouldn't
be sent back to MAILER-DAEMON and humans should send requests to the postmaster
if the problem is something a postmaster can help with.
Also note that best practices require an 'abuse' address as well as a
postmaster address.
