Re: POP-before-SMTP implementations

[Erik Bystr�m]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> An NFS filesystem is relatively low overhead, compared
> to "open connection to SQL database and INSERT,"
> etc.  I might have to write a custom RPC service
> sometime, because I'm trying to move away from NFS
> as much as possible.

NFS just seems a little overkill for this, I think.. Anyway, if you
decide to do it the RPC way, look into DRAC which I mentioned earlier.

Regards,

/erik.