On Sun, Nov 14, 1999 at 08:50:33AM +0000, Frederik Lindberg wrote:
> Was looking for something optimized to low bandwidth settings.
*slaps self* I'm pretty forgetful some times. So let me ask some more
questions:
> > > 2a. if -l: compare host name of envelope recipients. If same as local host
> > > name, deliver locally with qmail-local.
> > > 2b. deliver multi-recipient message remotely (concurrent with 2a). If -l:
> > > remove all recipients with host part matching the local host (me).
Any suggestions on how to do concurrent deliveries correctly (ie even
under error conditions)?
> > > 3. Generate one bounce message per local recipient. Generate pre-VERP
> > > bounce if one of more remote recipients are not accepted.
What do you mean by "pre-VERP"?
> The discussion was multi-recipient messages, where qmail isn't optimal
> under these conditions.
Especially when all the recipients are guaranteed to go to the same
single smarthost.
> Yes, starting with a qmail queue would be one way. Maybe waiting for
> qmail-2.0 is another ;-)
And nobody should bet their business on something that doesn't exist
yet, no matter how good the reputation.
--
Bruce Guenter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://em.ca/~bruceg/
