Jos Backus wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 23, 1999 at 11:41:30AM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> > Well, then have a look at the header of this email...
> >
> > In my first answer it was:
> >
> > Received: from unknown (HELO pipeline.ch) ([195.134.128.41])
> > (envelope-sender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
> > by mailtoaster1.pipeline.ch (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
> > for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 22 Sep 1999 09:29:01 -0000
>
> Cool! I didn't look at the header before, sorry.
>
> Now it's of course a matter of patches being politically acceptable here...
Why? It has actually nothing to do with ldap. It's simply contained
in there (together with the qmail-smtpd logging through tcpserver).
AFAIK you only need the changes I made to received.c (and don't forget
to change the "qmail-ldap-1.03" text).
There lots of other useful things in qmail-ldap which are not ldap
related. So far I haven't got time to break them out and make
independent patches.
--
Andre
