On 17-Sep-99 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>Wired seemed to have a slightly different take, but I stopped reading the >>Forbes article before I got to Gilmore's comment. >> >>http://www.wired.com/news/news/politics/story/21790.html > > I think that's the article forwarded to this list that I just read > earlier. A Gilmore comment was in that article as well. Wired > didn't strike me as having a different take so much as a vastly > more detailed, in-depth article, including plenty of historical > information, allegations of conspiracies of various sorts, and > so on. That's what I thought when I first saw it posted, but it's a different article with a different slant. It is referenced in the one posted tho. Vince. -- ========================================================================== Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] flame-mail: /dev/null # include <std/disclaimers.h> TEAM-OS2 Online Campground Directory http://www.camping-usa.com Online Giftshop Superstore http://www.cloudninegifts.com ==========================================================================
