Eric Rahmig writes:
> Russell Nelson writes:
> >Lyndon Griffin writes:
> > > thanks everyone for the quick response... now, my next question - does it
> > > not seem a little extreme to say that simply
> > > "qmail 1.03 no longer supports inetd."
> > > and then link to the ucspi-tcp package, which you kinda have to figure out
> > > for yourself that that's what the link is trying to tell you, when it is, as
> > > you all say, quite possible that qmail-smptd WILL run under inetd (maybe OS
> > > dependent)?
> >
> >Maybe we just have too high an opinion of your intelligence?
>
> Come on, is this kind of comment really necessary? Good grief.
Obviously, it is necessary. By linking to ucspi-tcp and telling
people that inetd is no longer supported, that should be taken as a
clue for what to do next. Since this is obviously not obvious, I need
to point out why I consider that such a link is an indication of the
high esteem in which I hold qmail users.
Is everything clear now?
--
-russ nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://russnelson.com
Crynwr sells support for free software | PGPok | Government schools are so
521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | bad that any rank amateur
Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | +1 315 268 9201 FAX | can outdo them. Homeschool!
