Bruno Wolff III wrote: > See rfc 2015 for how to have encrypted/signed MIME parts. Ahhh, Now I'm starting to get the picture. BTW, is it my paranoia setting going above the acceptable level or do I detect political reasons for Netscape and MS not being too terribly in a hurry to make their MUAs operate seamlessly with PGP/MIME? Some time ago, I received a PGP encrypted message which followed that standard (I didn't know that at the time). I eventually saved the "application/octet-stream" part to a file with a ".pgp" extension and opened it thru PGP. It'd be nice if the relevant MIME part could have a file name and extension, preferrably ".asc" so it could be immediately opened by the Windows version of PGP. From what I read in RFC2015 there's no problem with it. Please people stop me if the conversation gets TOO offtopic. > You might want to take a look at the mutt MUA. It works with PGP to > produce signed and/or encrypted messages. I have to support the Microsoft world here at the office. Mutt is Unix-only. Drats. :( > For example this message is signed, and you can take a look at the raw > headers to get some idea of how things are done.
begin:vcard n:Castro;Juan tel;work:540-9100 Ramal 46 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:http://www.appi.com.br/jcastro org:APPI Inform�tica;Desenvolvimento adr:;;Av. Ataulfo de Paiva, 135/1410 - Leblon;Rio de Janeiro;RJ;22499-900;Brasil version:2.1 email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] title:Consultor note;quoted-printable:One man alone cannot fight the future. USE LINUX!=0D=0A=0D=0A -- The X Racer=0D=0A=0D=0APGP Key ID 0xAAE4050C=0D=0A fn:Juan Carlos Castro y Castro end:vcard
