On Thu, Jul 15, 1999 at 03:12:59PM -0700, Troy Morrison wrote:
> I'm not convinced that we can't find an alternate solution, but it would
> be nice if the solution was to make /home a "faster" filesystem.
hmm.. unsing the INBOX in a hashed maildir style way should be enough.. what
imapd are you running?
Greetings
Bernd
--
(OO) -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] --
( .. ) ecki@{inka.de,linux.de,debian.org} http://home.pages.de/~eckes/
o--o *plush* 2048/93600EFD eckes@irc +497257930613 BE5-RIPE
(O____O) When cryptography is outlawed, bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl!
- Advantages with qmail and using reiserfs??? jeremy
- Re: Advantages with qmail and using reiser... Troy Morrison
- Re: Advantages with qmail and using re... Justin Bell
- Re: Advantages with qmail and usin... Troy Morrison
- Re: Advantages with qmail and ... John Gonzalez/netMDC admin
- Re: Advantages with qmail... Sam
- Re: Advantages with q... Racer X
- Re: Advantages with qmail and ... Bernd Eckenfels
- Re: Advantages with qmail... Troy Morrison
- Re: Advantages with qmail and using re... Aaron Nabil
- Re: Advantages with qmail and using re... vogelke
- Re: Advantages with qmail and using re... Dave Sill
- Re: Advantages with qmail and usin... Scott Schwartz
- Re: Advantages with qmail and usin... Jason Haar
