Re: autoconf?

[Sam]

Adam D. McKenna writes:

> On Thu, Jul 01, 1999 at 01:07:40PM -0400, Dave Sill wrote:
> > "Sam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >Does "his" way support VPATH builds?  Cross-compiling?  Build-roots?
> > 
> > Sometimes "better" doesn't mean "has more features". Sometimes it
> > means smaller, simpler, more reliable. Hmm, sounds like qmail.
> 
> Also, the qmail tgz's are much more self-contained.  They depend on far
> fewer system libraries than something like pine.

Autoconf+automake themselves don't depend on any non-standard system
libraries.  All they need is a halfway-decent shell, and reasonable sed.

-- 
Sam