On Tue, Jun 29, 1999 at 09:36:00AM -0600, Scott D. Yelich wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 29 Jun 1999, Adam D. McKenna wrote:
> > I dunno about you but when I ask a question in a public forum I usually
> > actively look for responses. To not even make a cursory check before asking
> > again is rude to everyone on this list, and especially the people who
> > responded the first time.
>
> cursory...
>
> http://www.ornl.gov/its/archives/mailing-lists/qmail/1999/06/maillist.html
> search for my name
> find "Qmail Qs"
> search for the next occurrence...
> it doesn't re-occur.
That's because the topic wasn't "Qmail Qs", it was "PTR issue / question", and
you received seven replies, the last of which was from Mr. Bernstein.
> > I wonder what you could have done to piss someone off this badly.
>
> Whack Kevin Mitnick? Make the script kiddies look even more pathetic
> than they are (ie: see upcoming NYT article[s]). I hope you are not one
> of those ``FREE KEVIN'' kiddies? tchrist of #perl doesn't like me
> either -- but that's probably just because I'm a bigger asshole than he
> is online and he's just jealous or has a crush on me -- I just can't
> tell.
Not that this is an appropriate forum for this discussion, but are you saying
that you support the government holding Kevin Mitnick for four years without
bail or trial?
> ps: I had a DNS question about why MX hosts couldn't be CNAMEs.
> Everyone seems to say "READ THE RFC" -- but no one seems to know which
> one? Perhaps they haven't actually really read the RFCs themselves? I
> was lucky enough to get a message back from an/the author of BIND9 --
> and I appreciate it. But, the question still remains -- why is a MX
> that is a CNAME a bad thing? Sorry to be pedantic.
Mailing List Archive Search Results
Documents 1 to 10 of 81 documents containing: mx And record And cname And dns
1. Mail, CNAME, A records, and MX
http://www.ornl.gov/its/archives/mailing-lists/qmail/1999/03/msg01291.html - size:
4773 bytes
2. Re: DNS and connection refusal
http://www.ornl.gov/its/archives/mailing-lists/qmail/1997/09/msg00945.html - size:
4523 bytes
Hmm, the second hit exactly answers your question. Gee that was hard.
--Adam
