[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >What are the advantages/disadvantages of cyclog over syslog? Advantages: performance, automatic rotation, predetermined maximum size, ability to filter for unusual messages using "usually", no remote access and associated security problems, timestamps are more precise. Disadvantages: only logs messages sent to stdout, only logs messages from local system, doesn't chunk logs by day/week/etc--only by size, dates/times aren't human-readable without "tailocal", throws away oldest logs. -Dave
- Queue limit question Matthew Harrell
- Re: Queue limit question Matthew Harrell
- Re: Queue limit question Mark Delany
- Re: Queue limit question Matthew Harrell
- Re: Queue limit question Mark Delany
- Re: Queue limit question Matthew Harrell
- Re: Queue limit question Mark Delany
- Re: Queue limit question dirk
- Re: Queue limit question Adam D. McKenna
- Re: Queue limit question dirk
- Re: cyclog vs. syslog (was: Queue limit q... Dave Sill
- Re: cyclog vs. syslog (was: Queue li... Stefan Paletta
- Re: cyclog vs. syslog (was: Queu... Keith Burdis
- Re: cyclog vs. syslog (was: ... Stefan Paletta
- RE: cyclog vs. syslog (was: Queue li... Arnaldo Mandel
- mailman mail list and rcpthosts Bob Ruddy
- Re: mailman mail list and rcpthosts Chris Johnson
- Re: mailman mail list and rcpthosts Russ Allbery
- Re: Queue limit question Russell Nelson
- Re: Queue limit question Fred Lindberg