Re: Qmail mailing list and ReplyTo:

[Peter van Dijk]

On Fri, Feb 19, 1999 at 03:14:53PM +0100, Rok Papez wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Feb 1999 11:30:03 -0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >damn Reply-To field myself upon request of my users. Are there any
> >ports of Mutt to the Windows world so that I can recommend that for my
> >users?
> 
> Mutt is very unintuitive (PINE *is* intuitive), I tried it, didn't
> like it. I wish that PINE had as many features as mutt has, tho.
> I prefer PINE and PMMail over anything else.

I've been using Pine for about 3 years (and liked it, albeit it's very slow on big
mailboxes). After switching to mutt (for Maildir and PGP support) I found mutt _very_
intuitive.. Nothing wrong there. I only use Pine for reading News, nowadays.

Greetz, Peter.
-- 
.| Peter van Dijk           | <mo|VERWEG> stoned worden of coden
.| [EMAIL PROTECTED]  | <mo|VERWEG> dat is de levensvraag
                            | <mo|VERWEG> coden of stoned worden
                            | <mo|VERWEG> stonend worden En coden
                            | <mo|VERWEG> hmm
                            | <mo|VERWEG> dan maar stoned worden en slashdot lezen:)