Eric Dahnke writes:
> Hello list friends,
>
> First, there is no way set RELAYCLIENT (via inetd, tcpserver, or some
> patch) based on domain name rather than IP, correct? (I realize it would
> be weak)
There's a patch on www.qmail.org. Search for Chuck Foster. Yes, it
is weaker than relying on an IP address; fortunately most spammers do
not have access to DNS servers. This is the algorithm that PostFix
uses.
> Second, with inetd it is not possible to set RELAYCLIENT with a wildcard
> * (24.232.12.*), but with tcpserver yes, correct?
Well, you *can* with inetd, but tcpserver performs better.
--
-russ nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://crynwr.com/~nelson
Crynwr supports Open Source(tm) Software| PGPok | There is good evidence
521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | that freedom is the
Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | +1 315 268 9201 FAX | cause of world peace.
