No, I doubt it. Spamassassin will do the same tests (network tests are slow...) with sa_alt or with fast_spamassassin. The difference is the output and the parse of it, but that should really use a very short amount of time.
REgards ST At 12:59 +0100 9-11-2012, Alessio Cecchi wrote: >Hi, > >I thinks that my qmail-scanner 2.10st can run faster by chaning some >configuration options but which one? > >For example, disable --sa-alt and --sa-report can decrease the time of scan? > >Thanks > >./configure \ >--qs-user clamav \ >--admin postmaster \ >--domain skye.it \ >--admin-description "Qmail-Admin" \ >--notify none \ >--local-domains skye.it \ >--silent-viruses auto \ >--dlp-monitor "" \ >--virus-to-delete 0 \ >--skip-text-msgs 0 \ >--lang en_GB \ >--debug 1 \ >--add-dscr-hdrs 0 \ >--dscr-hdrs-text "X-Qmail-Email" \ >--normalize yes \ >--archive 0 \ >--settings-per-domain 1 \ >--max-scan-size 5242880 \ >--unzip 0 \ >--max-zip-size 5242880 \ >--max-unpacked-files 100 \ >--redundant 1 \ >--log-details yes \ >--log-crypto 0 \ >--fix-mime 0 \ >--ignore-eol-check 1 \ >--sa-tempfail 0 \ >--sa-maxsize 307200 \ >--sa-timeout 10 \ >--sa-socket /var/run/spamd-socket \ >--sa-sql 1 \ >--sa-delta 0 \ >--sa-alt 1 \ >--sa-debug 0 \ >--sa-report 1 \ >--sa-quarantine 0 \ >--sa-delete 5 \ >--sa-reject 1 \ >--scanners "clamdscan,fast_spamassassin" \ >--install 1 > >-- >Alessio Cecchi is: >@ ILS -> http://www.linux.it/~alessice/ >on LinkedIn -> http://www.linkedin.com/in/alessice >Assistenza Sistemi GNU/Linux -> http://www.cecchi.biz/ >@ PLUG -> ex-Presidente, adesso senatore a vita, http://www.prato.linux.it > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_nov _______________________________________________ Qmail-scanner-general mailing list Qmail-scanner-general@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qmail-scanner-general