Przemek wrote:

>Sep 24 03:22:39 nasa spamd[11198]: connection from localhost [127.0.0.1] at 
>port 40865 
>Sep 24 03:22:39 nasa spamd[11198]: handle_user: unable to find user '[EMAIL 
>PROTECTED]'! 
>Sep 24 03:22:39 nasa spamd[11198]: Still running as root: user not specified 
>with -u, not found, or set to root.  Fall back to nobody. 
>Sep 24 03:22:39 nasa spamd[11198]: processing message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for 
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]:99. 
>Sep 24 03:22:45 nasa spamd[11198]: clean message (-100.0/5.0) for [EMAIL 
>PROTECTED]:99 in 5.3 seconds, 3188 bytes. 
>  
>
>Is this correct? or should i do with other way?
>
>  
>
There is no problem here. Other that spamd's debugging giving you the
heeby-geebies when it didn't intend to :-)

Qmail-Scanner passes the recipient (for single-recipient messages) to
the call to spamc so that those sites who want to do per-user SA rules
can. You obviously aren't, and spamd is merely reporting the fact that
it couldn't find any reference to config details for that user.

PS: you are running spamd as root. Ask yourself why.


-- 
Cheers

Jason Haar
Information Security Manager, Trimble Navigation Ltd.
Phone: +64 3 9635 377 Fax: +64 3 9635 417
PGP Fingerprint: 7A2E 0407 C9A6 CAF6 2B9F 8422 C063 5EBB FE1D 66D1



-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
_______________________________________________
Qmail-scanner-general mailing list
Qmail-scanner-general@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qmail-scanner-general

Reply via email to