At 11:21 +0200 14-04-2005, Erik Wasser wrote:
Hello list,

I installed qmail-scanner-1.25 with the 'q-s-1.25st-20050406 patch and
it's running too.

But I still got a problem here. When I'm doing a multi-rcpt-to message
the mails are looking different.

According to the logfiles both mails where scanned with the right '-u'
parameter. But I don't defined any user parameter in the data database
backend so I don't think this is the reason for the different output.

Great!!! It is working exactly as I expected even if I couldn't test it because I don't use 'sql settings'


Here is mail 1 (only the relevant header details):

 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0
 X-Qmail-Scanner-Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on
sv0.topdomain.invalid
 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50,
         [...]
         autolearn=no version=3.0.1
 X-Spam-Level:

And mail 2:

 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0
 X-Spam-Report: SA TESTS
   [...]
  -3.3 ALL_TRUSTED            Did not pass through any untrusted hosts
   0.0 BAYES_50               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to
60%
 X-Qmail-Scanner-Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on
sv0.topdomain.invalid
X-Qmail-Scanner-MOVED-X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0
tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50,[...]
autolearn=no version=3.0.1
> X-Spam-Level:

        --debug 1  \
        --minidebug 1  \

Disable debug (not minidebug) and you will get only the information you need to track ordinary issues..


        --sa-alt 0  \
        --sa-debug 0  \
        --sa-report 0  \

Here is the issue, you are using 'verbose_spamassassin'... It is not possible (without doing crazy things) to run twice 'verbose_spamassassin' so what QS-st does is run sa_alt (with sa-debug and sa-report enabled) for the second recipient and so on.. My thought was that the only logical reasson to run verbosse_spamassassin was to have the report in the headers...


This is my advice (take or leave it) run fast_spamassassin, with sa_alt or not.

Cheers

Salvatore


------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Qmail-scanner-general mailing list Qmail-scanner-general@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qmail-scanner-general

Reply via email to