Well it doesn't violate RFC821, but that has nothing to do with the errors in his Header, probably the
Content-Type: text/plain;<lf><tab>charset="iso-8859-1"<lf>
is what's causing the Disallowed breakage found in header name - potential virus
what RFC is he violating? 822?, 2045? 2424?
or is this a problem with Qmail Scanner 1.20?
Any help would be appreciated...
Thanks,
rob.
Received: from mail.woosteroh.com (xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx)$ by xxx.xxx.xxx.xxxx with SMTP; 14 May 2004 14:59:11 -0000$ Received: from [xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx] (helo=IT04)$ ^Iby mail.xxxxxx.com with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))$ ^Iid 1BOdE3-0004GN-00; Fri, 14 May 2004 09:59:47 -0400$ Return-Receipt-To: "xx xxxx" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>$ Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>$ From: "xxxxx" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>$ To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>$ Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>$ Subject: RE: Email Being Blocked$ Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 10:01:51 -0400$ Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>$ MIME-Version: 1.0$ Content-Type: text/plain;$ ^Icharset="iso-8859-1"$ Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit$ X-Priority: 3 (Normal)$ X-MSMail-Priority: Normal$ X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)$ X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409$ Importance: Normal$ In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>$ Disposition-Notification-To: "xxxxxxxxx" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>$ X-City of xxxxxx-MailScanner: Found to be clean$
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the new InstallShield X.
From Windows to Linux, servers to mobile, InstallShield X is the one
installation-authoring solution that does it all. Learn more and evaluate today! http://www.installshield.com/Dev2Dev/0504 _______________________________________________ Qmail-scanner-general mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qmail-scanner-general
