On Friday, March 26, 2004 at 15:33 (which was Friday, March 26, 2004 at 16:33 where I am) Ludvig Omholt wrote:
>> How do I stop this? This header is already added by SpamAssassin and I >> don't want to change that. > I agree, this could be an option but the default should not break > existing filters. I patched qmail-scanner-queue.template for this to > work as before. Well, not entirely. qmail-scanner 1.20 didn't have a definition for $sa_symbol in the first place. So, while your patch makes sure that the X-Spam-Level: header once again uses the asterisk instead of the plus-symbol, it still means that qmail-scanner is meddling with this header. From CHANGES, I see some of the rationale behind adding the header, but I think that qmail-scanner should no-longer bother if verbose_spamassassin is used. In that case, SpamAssassin has already added the X-Spam-Level: header and replacing it is IMHO not necessary. Moreover, since the character used to indicate the level in X-Spam-Level: is configurable in SpamAssassin's local.cf, replacing it, breaks intended configuration of the level-indicator from there, as well as confuses long-time users because as a result of qmail-scanner's interference, the X-Spam-Level header gets moved way up in the region of the 'Received:' headers instead of where SpamAssassin puts it, at the bottom of the RFC822 header. In short: Jason, can you please make this behaviour either optional, or at least not happen when running verbose_spamassassin when it would be redundant anyway? -- Greetings, Maurice ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id70&alloc_id638&op=click _______________________________________________ Qmail-scanner-general mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qmail-scanner-general
