On Fri, 2004-02-27 at 00:47, Jeff Koch wrote: > We're setting up a mailserver to do anti-virus filtering and would like to > use ClamAV but we're concerned that it might not be as effective or the > updates as timely as the commercial filters like McAfee or F-Secure. Has > anyone setup both? Can we get some comments on how they compare? Thanks.
qmail-scanner and clamav are a great combo. Clamav usually has definitions out before any of the "Big Name" anti virus names. I use that combo on many servers and have norton corporate as a second level virus catcher. The only time norton ever gets a hit is when one of our users uses their hotmail or whatever personal accounts they may have. My opinion ... You would have to beat me with a sledge hammer before I would give up our qmail - qmail-scanner - clamav combo. -- Russel Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click _______________________________________________ Qmail-scanner-general mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qmail-scanner-general
