On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 11:12:42AM +1300, Jason Haar wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 12:01:34PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > There was some discussion on the list about the 1.20rc3 f-secure 4.5x returncode
> > handling.. because the returncodes have changed. was there any conclusion, does
> > the 1.20rc3 do the right thing or do we need to change the code more..
>
> As far as I'm aware, there are no issues with 1.20rc3 with the newer f-secure.
> Anyone who knows different, please fix and send us the patch...
seems fine so far, thanks :) the only problem was solved by the
if ( $fsecure_status > 0 ) {
--->
if ( $fsecure_status !~ /^(0|9)$/ ) {
fix. (using fsav 4.51).
regards,
Olivier
--
_________________________________________________________________
Olivier Mueller - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - PGPkeyID: 0E84D2EA - Switzerland
qmail projects: http://omail.omnis.ch - http://webmail.omnis.ch
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects.
See the people who have HELPED US provide better services:
Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php
_______________________________________________
Qmail-scanner-general mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qmail-scanner-general
