On Tuesday 23 September 2003 14:39, Pete Henshall wrote: > Hi qmail-scanner-list > > > I've been using qmail-scanner-1.20rc3 and it seems to be working out > > well. depending on your antivirus scanner and such. We're using a fresh > > default install of perl 5.8.0, on a slackware 9.0 box with sophos sweep. > > It seems > > to > > Why aren't you using Sophie out of interest? Much quicker :)
Good question... I'll check into it! > While I am at it does anyone have a good known list (ie from someones > config) of a good setup of rbl servers, I added spamhaus as well as > relays.ordb - any other good ones I missed? I simply use bl.spamcop.net.... Seems to be a nice free active blacklist. > Also while I am here, did the thread about Q-Src3 being slower than other > versions come to anything, I have noticed that my boxes load did go up > somewhere between .16 and now.... don't know if it is related to the Could be.... but it could also be perl or your antivirus scanner as well. Perl tends to be heavy and if you're now using 5.8.0 from 5.6.1 it makes a difference. Brandon ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Qmail-scanner-general mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qmail-scanner-general
