Pentium II 350 Mhz 256 Mb Ram, HD IDE
RedHat 7.3 - Perl 5.6 - kernel 2.4.20
Spamassasin 2.55, Sophie 3.03, sweep 3.73, qmail-scanner-1.16

Average over 387 messages (1 hour)
p_s:            0,017859015 secs
sophie: 0,101077591 secs
S_A:            0,693710315 secs
Total:  1,163049947 secs



Pentium III 1000 Mhz 512 Mb Ram, HD SCSI
RedHat 7.3 - Perl 5.6 - kernel 2.4.22
Spamassasin 2.55, Sophie 3.03, sweep 3.73, qmail-scanner-1.16


Average over 33 messages (1 hour) sophie: 0,075714515 secs S_A: 1,308789364 secs p_s: 0,006935515 secs init_scan: 1,392487788 secs Total: 3,880213758 secs



I've done another test, I sent 5 times the same messages with Sobig to both servers, here are the times:


qs 1.16 qs 1.2rc3

p_s:    0.019622 secs           sophie  0.028746 secs
Total   1.162525 secs           ini_sc: 0.029422 secs
                                Total   4.21307 secs

p_s:    0.019237 secs           sophie  0.028724 secs
Total   1.155827 secs           ini_sc: 0.029367 secs
                                Total   6.121325 secs

p_s:    0.019579 secs           sophie  0.029379 secs
Total   1.146672 secs           ini_sc: 0.030058 secs
                                Total   5.691523 secs

p_s:    0.019264 secs           sophie  0.02866 secs
Total   1.14102 secs            ini_sc: 0.029198 secs
                                Total   4.899419 secs

p_s:    0.019266 secs           sophie  0.028825 secs
Total   1.11769 secs            ini_sc: 0.029422 secs
                                Total   4.68664 secs


It looks like something after the scans in the second box is working slowly, even if the second box is more powerfull.


And there is another thing curious, the perl-scanner looks faster than sophie..

Salvatore


------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Qmail-scanner-general mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qmail-scanner-general

Reply via email to