What are you makes so special? why can't I send and you can? You just did.
dude, if you can't answer my question why don't you not answer at all. everyone knows that those patches are not included .. duh and I'm pretty much sure that someone running both of them at the same time.. and the reason I send this e-mail to both is because people might run both of those patches on those two lists, I know crossover is not good but both of those mailing lists are legible for this question. as for my technical ability.. you don't know what I can and what I can't there for why don't you keep your mouth shut and one again.. if you don't know how to answer someone's question: DO NOT ANSWER ANYTHING AT ALL. looks who's talking.. a person who keeps constantly sending request receipts to lists.. how smart is this! ----- Original Message ----- From: "Robin S. Socha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 12:24 PM Subject: Re: patch > * alexus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Do not send mail to two lists, ever. Particularly not if one of them is > protected like the qmail list. > > > I'm running a qmail-1.0.3. I applyed qmail-1.03-starttls-requireauth.patch > > So you're not running stock qmail. DJB has not included these patches > into the distribution for a reason. The result is that you're on your > own now. You would be, anyway, because your question is the result of > your technical inability (proven many times) of running a Unix machine. > > > a little help please? > > RTFM: man patch > _______________________________________________________________ Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Qmail-scanner-general mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qmail-scanner-general
