Hi,

I have a similar research problem, and the dots seem to be a wonderful solution.

So, this email does not give any assistance re the original question, just an 
answer to the question below:

Am 2023/07/27 um 03:45 schrieb chris hermansen via QGIS-User 
<qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org>:

Here's (apologies for the closed source link) an example of the type of 
map/symbology I'm trying to 
describe.https://www.arcgis.com/apps/mapviewer/index.html?webmap=30d2e10d4d694b3eb4dc4d2e58dbb5a5

Thanks for any suggestions!

What about just shading the polygons using a gray scale?

Given that your polygons should generate a uniform density of dots within the 
area they bound, I don't see value in generating the dots for symbology.

The polygon area may vary, as it does in my research (distribution of burials 
in administrative areas). Therefore, a small area always looks underrepresented 
as compared to a larger area, and vice versa. I have large administrative areas 
with low densitiy, but they look well populated even with a very light shade of 
grey.

So I would like to try to find a solution to Chris' problem since the 
representation with dots is closer to reality than colouring areas. I will 
report when I found a solution for my use case -- though this may be autumn...

Maria
_______________________________________________
QGIS-User mailing list
QGIS-User@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user

Reply via email to