Hi,

Just my grain of salt...  I believe the latest move from QGIS to change to a more recent version of the PROJ library (and to rely more on this library), is seen as a way to move GIS from a cartographic quality GIS to a Survey level precision GIS.  This is a good move but, as many have seen on this list, not an easy one. Things seems to have calmed down recently as people start understanding the error messages and as QGIS adapted to user demands.

The only way, as I see it, that GARMIN  is "privatizing the geography", as you nicely put it,  is by selling map to their map capable units.  It would be nice to have the capability of uploading our own maps to those units.  Apart from that, positions, waypoints   and tracks can be uploaded and download with propitiatory and non propitiatory software.  I believe QGIS had a plugin capable of doing that with multiple consumer level GPS but I have never used it.  Maybe they have been more aggressive lately? I don't know.

As for the High resolution-precision problem, It's important to remember that typical consumer level chips are not made to give you more than 2 to 10m precision.  This is not because of any effort on there part to make the units less precise.  It's simply because of the way a position is obtained by these units.  Using the same point and shoot method (or Code Measurements instantaneous position determination), A 100,000,000$ GPS might give you a slightly better position but only because is has a better internal clock and a better Geoid model.  In order to get a more precise positions, professional GPS units use things like RTK, Dual frequency, DGPS, but most importantly, they store the satellite information for later use in a post-processing software.  These function are simply not built or used in phones or consumer GPS devices. Any unit using instantaneous position determination will always be plague by orbital errors, satellite cloak errors, Ionospheric and troposphere errors, multipath and receiver noise...  The only thing they can change is the receiver clock and the antenna.  A technique called PPP, or Precise Point Positioning is a technique were one uses a single GPS unit to find precise position after a long observation.  Again, the most we can do with consumer lever gps is to average out positions.  This is not PPP which uses the rinex files stored in the unit, correct for clock and ephemerides...

If you are interested in bringing High precision GPS to the table, I suggest RTKlib (http://www.rtklib.com/) for post processing. Again, you will need a deceive capable of storing the satellite information if you want to do this.  A plugin from RTKlib to QGIS could be made it guess.  That would be nice.

Cheers!

Nicolas


On 2020-05-25 1:47 p.m., Falk Huettmann wrote:
Dear List,
I think these GPS high resolution suggestions are great;
thanks.

But my real interest/question here is, how can we bring it home to QGIS ?

I see GARMIN essentially trying to sell and impose on us their GIS system,
same applies to OpenStreet Maps etc etc. So they try to privatize geography and public space and information,
which I am mostly opposed to.

Instead, I wonder how we can use QGIS and release the commercial
data into Open Source and public use ?
That's for HIGH RESOLUTION data discussed here.

Thanks for such questions and solutions.

Very best
   Falk Huettmann PhD, Professor
    Uni of Alaska Fairbanks


On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 9:41 AM Kirk Schmidt <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Hi List:

    In my experience, the key is writing output in rinex format so
    that the rover data can be corrected either using PPP if you can
    collect your GPS data over and extended period of time or use
    pre-existing (or self deployed) base station over a know
    coordinate to provide correction data.  Most consumer grade units
    output the final position solution, not detailed satellite data
    which is required for followup processing.

    Kirk Schmidt

    On 5/25/2020 2:31 PM, chris hermansen wrote:
    Martin and list,

    To me, in general, I think I would try to go with a Raspberry Pi
    based solution.  The hardware isn't all that expensive and the
    easy ability to do stuff directly with the output of the device
    in Python or some other programming language seems to be
    preferable to messing around with Android or iOS applications.

    One of many articles that may be of interest
    
https://learn.adafruit.com/adafruit-ultimate-gps-on-the-raspberry-pi?view=all

    On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 9:25 AM Martin Weis
    <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        Dear list,

        I would like to add some things here, since I am trying to
        use RTK GPS
        in the field with mobile devices.

        > 1) Accuracy of GPS Devices

        RTK GPS or any more precice GPS technology will be external,
        you cannot
        get around the missing measurements and lack of algorithms in
        consumer
        grade chips.

        Then it depends on the capabilities of the device to receive
        satellites
        of all systems (one or multiple frequencies/signals) and be
        able to
        apply correction data (a question of algorithms). For better
        equipment
        the prices rise quickly.

        There are some low cost devices evolving, a new chip was recently
        announced: Skytraq PX1122R for about $100. Could be tested
        with a break
        out board and antenna, e.g. see board at navspark shop. The
        module even
        supports PPP, which might be especially interesting where
        mobile network
        is not available.
        
https://navspark.mybigcommerce.com/px1122r-evb-px1122r-multi-band-quad-gnss-rtk-evaluation-board/

        Other low cost solution were mentioned (emlid/REACH,
        Catalyst, etc).


        Am 23.05.20 um 21:51 schrieb Michael.Dodd:
        > One app that claims to do a lot of what high precions gps
        does is> Mobile Topographer Free – Apps on Google Play

        > 2) Software

        On Android I was able to get the external signal into the
        system, you
        need the app "Bluetoth GPS" (or similar) or a USB2serial +
        app (better
        avoid tiny plugs and large cables during field work).
        Additionally you
        need to override the internal GPS position with the Blue GPS
        App in the
        developer settings (mock provider).

        My impression was, that most Android applications target the
        accuracy of
        the device only, so e.g.

        * you cannot zoom to cm-levels, only ~100m
        * not many proper GIS Apps are available, most are expensive
        * Tracking usually does not rely on cm-grade positions, so
        the apps are
        not made for it

        One particular thing is, that with high accuracy of the
        signal, an
        internal computation in single precision float will not
        suffice (all
        computations must be in double precision), and you may end up
        with a cut
        off of the last position digits, e.g. if you have 8 digits, 4
        before and
        4 after the decimal separator (e.g. in DDMM.MMMM format),
        then you end
        up with coordinates cut down to 2-3 decimeters in the real world
        (typical GPS mouse output, not so uncommon).

        So, looking into that aspect may be required, and only few
        Apps may
        implement that (e.g. expensive "surveyor" apps for
        professionals? did
        not test).
        BTW, sponsoring the double accuracy implementation for QField is
        welcome, as mentioned ot the webpage. It is already a very
        usable and
        FLOSS GIS solution for the field, especially useful if you
        have a QGIS
        workflow already ;)

        Finding proper solutions and recommendations still required...



        >
        ------------------------------------------------------------------------
        > *From:* Qgis-user <[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of
        > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
        > *Sent:* 23 May 2020 20:35
        > *To:* [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>>
        > *Subject:* Re: [Qgis-user] wishing for accurate
        lattitude/longitude from
        > a cell phone
        >
        >
        > Hi Steve,
        >
        > I think there are two different aspects to your question:
        > 1) Accuracy of GPS Devices
        > I agree with others that you can't expect a better accuracy
        than the 10
        > to 30 feet you observed with a smartphone or a simple
        handheld GPS. This
        > might improve by averaging, but this takes time. Survey
        grade GPS
        > devices are very expensive. It is possible to get good
        modules and
        > antennas as components, but building a complete GNSS system
        requires
        > time and skill. This would reduce cost, but only to several
        hundred
        > instead of several thousand dollars, so this is no option
        in your case.
        > Besides, you will still need a correction data service
        (usually costly)
        > or use two receivers (rover and base).
        > So you probably have to stick with your phone, which is
        more flexible
        > regarding the software than a handheld GPS.
        >
        > 2) Software
        > The accuracy of the recorded position should not depend on
        where you tap
        > the screen - a good app should allow to record the current
        GPS position.
        > I am using Locus Map (Asamm Software) for a while now, it
        works quite
        > well, although it does not allow position averaging. There
        is a free
        > version, you could try that first.
        >
        > Regards,
        > Jochen
        >
        > Am 22.05.20 um 20:54 schrieb Stephen Sacks:
        >>
        >> In order to make widely available some wise advice, I'm
        sending to
        >> this list a message I received from Neil B. In addition to
        Neil's
        >> message below, I want to mention that Nicolas Cadieux also
        provided
        >> similar information, saying I'd have to pay around $1,000 for
        >> equipment that gives consistently accurate location
        coordinates.  And
        >> thanks, also to Falk Huettmann and Bernd Vogelgesang for
        their replies.
        >>
        >>
        >> Message from Neil B:
        >>
        >> Hello Stephen.
        >> Glad that you're having success. I would like to start off
        by saying
        >> that it is best to always reply to the mailing list and
        not directly
        >> to the person who submitted the email. Mailing lists work
        really well
        >> in that there is a pool of people out there who may be
        able to offer
        >> advice or may have an alternate method to solve the
        problem that may
        >> turn out to be a better way. On the flip side by
        maintaining the email
        >> chain through the mailing list, the follow up emails that
        provide
        >> information are stored in the archives which benefits
        anyone searching
        >> the internet to have the complete trail of information.
        >>
        >> As far as your results they are acceptable for the device
        you're
        >> using. GPS in phones are never built to precision survey
        standards and
        >> there is no reason for them to be. If you're within 30ft
        of where the
        >> phone thinks you should be then you can easily navigate
        the rest of
        >> the way by visual sight. High end equipment to achieve
        sub-inch
        >> accuracy is probably in the range of thousands of dollars.
        One thing
        >> to keep in mind is there is a difference between the
        accuracy of a
        >> device and to what level of precision they display. While
        the app on
        >> the phone may display 8 decimal places of a lat/long
        coordinate and
        >> tell you if you have moved a foot, it doesn't help that
        the coordinate
        >> it is displaying is out +/- 30 feet. The accuracy of a
        device can also
        >> be affected by the environment where the device is being
        operated. In
        >> regards to cell phones, they use multiple sources to determine
        >> location such as GPS, cell phone towers, and wifi points
        to perform
        >> the triangulation. Lack of line of sight to satellites,
        signals from
        >> cell towers bouncing off of surrounding buildings, or
        someone's
        >> wireless router using inaccurate position information can
        all affect
        >> the accuracy of what is being displayed on your phone.
        >>
        >> So the question is how are you determining that the
        coordinates are
        >> wrong? If you have information that you trust to be
        authoritative then
        >> adjust your points to those values and carry on. I have no
        advice or
        >> opinions on inexpensive devices that may help with a more
        accurate
        >> reading.
        >>
        >> Please do not respond directly to me. This email account
        is not
        >> actively monitored and I don't always have the time to
        follow up with
        >> the emails. All the best with your endeavours.
        >>
        >> ~Neil B.
        >>
        >> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 7:52 PM Stephen Sacks
        <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        >> <mailto:[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote:
        >>
        >>     Hi Neil,
        >>
        >>        With your help, I have successfully brought the
        corners of our
        >>     gardens back from Pennsylvania to the Promenade here
        in Brooklyn
        >>     Heights, New York.  Thank you.
        >>        At the risk of wearing out my welcome, I'm now
        asking for more
        >>     advice.  My point features are approximately where
        they should be
        >>     but not exactly, some points are just a few feet off
        and some are
        >>     10 or even 30 feet off.  I imported the data trying
        both EPSG 4326
        >>     and 4269.
        >>        I'm now convinced that the problem is due to (1) my
        Google
        >>     Pixel 3 cellphone, (2) the app I'm using ("Latitude
        Longitude"
        >>     published by gps-coordinates), and especially (3) my
        >>     less-than-steady hands.  I capture coordinates by
        standing at
        >>     spot, waiting for the blue dot to settle, and then
        touching the
        >>     blue dot.  Often I don't touch the screen at exactly
        the right
        >>     place.  I tried another app ("GPS Coordinates"
        published by
        >>     Financept) which is better in that it allows me to
        zoom in, but
        >>     I'm still not always getting it right.
        >>       I'm thinking now that I need specialized equipment. 
        That is
        >>     what I want to ask you.  Can you recommend some
        inexpensive device
        >>     that will allow me to simply press a button to record
        accurately
        >>     the coordinates of the point where I'm standing?  Keep
        in mind
        >>     that this is a community project with no funding.  I
        live on
        >>     Social Security and a university pension, but I'm
        willing to pay
        >>     something in the range of $50 or a bit more.  Do you
        know of
        >>     anything at such a modest price, or would I have to
        pay much
        >>     more?  Or perhaps you know of better software for my
        Android Pixel
        >>     3 phone.
        >>          Thanks in advance for any advice you might offer.
        >>                       Steve
        >>
        >>
        >>
        >> _______________________________________________
        >> Qgis-user mailing list
        >> [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>
        <mailto:[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>>
        >> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
        >> Unsubscribe:
        https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
        >
        >
        >
        > _______________________________________________
        > Qgis-user mailing list
        > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        > List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
        > Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
        >

        _______________________________________________
        Qgis-user mailing list
        [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
        Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user



-- Chris Hermansen · clhermansen "at" gmail "dot" com

    C'est ma façon de parler.

    _______________________________________________
    Qgis-user mailing list
    [email protected]  <mailto:[email protected]>
    List info:https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
    Unsubscribe:https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user

-- Kirk Schmidt, MScF, BScF, RPF
    General Manager
    Nortek Resource Solutions Inc.
    RR # 1
    Thorburn, NS
    B0K 1W0
    Tel (902) 922.3607
    Email:[email protected]  <mailto:[email protected]>
    Web:www.nortekresources.com  
<https://smex-ctp.trendmicro.com:443/wis/clicktime/v1/query?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.nortekresources.com&umid=52649abd-d7eb-4e03-a0bd-9b22a1a7a03f&auth=276d51547942e21b974d48c8cd7101aa75dd6e1a-4c1ca1539d0423c461bd2839cfd86077b8a55015>

    _______________________________________________
    Qgis-user mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
    Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user


_______________________________________________
Qgis-user mailing list
[email protected]
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
_______________________________________________
Qgis-user mailing list
[email protected]
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user

Reply via email to