Just one issue I did not see addressed so far. 
The type of antenna a GPS uses makes a big difference. In forested landscapes, 
the eTrex, for example, with its flat antenna (like a single penny) is 
noticeable worse for receiving satellite data than a Garmin 60 series with an 
antenna formed like a stack of pennies. The more obstruction to the satellite's 
direct line of sight, the larger the difference. 
Jake

-----Original Message-----
From: Qgis-user On Behalf Of Randal Hale
Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2020 9:03
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Qgis-user] wishing for accurate lattitude/longitude from a cell 
phone

One other thing that may or may not be of use but the USDA Forest Service 
Publishes a GPS Receiver Report that covers phones - and that's helped if I've 
had a client go "Well I have a Apple <something> or a Android <thing>". At 
least I feel slightly better going "good enough" or "no not good enough".

It should be good worldwide (but I will admit I think phones are my 'tech 
ceiling' these days) but your mileage may vary.

https://www.fs.fed.us/database/gps/mtdcrept/accuracy/index.htm

Randy

On 5/22/20 8:55 PM, Priv.-Doz. Dr. Maria Shinoto wrote:
> Somehow I did not follow the discussion, but like to add some of our 
> experience.
>
> We are doing field work in a remote region in the southern Japanese 
> mountains, archaeological surveys on the ground based on LiDAR data.
>
> A simple Garmin etrex10 is mostly reliable in an area of 40cm by 40cm around 
> a measured point, if used repeatedly at this point and the point is located 
> in the middle of a valley. Even cell phones do a good enough job. As soon as 
> we get closer to the steep slopes, the accuracy of the Garmin is less than 5 
> to 10 meters. We can check this with the detailed LiDAR based map, and 
> geologists told us, that even an expensive device could not be more precise 
> under these conditions. So we decided to measure traditionally on the ground 
> if precise measure is necessary, otherwise note the GPS data and the location 
> as shown in the map.
>
> To sum up, we came to the conclusion not to spend money on an expensive GPS 
> that may not work in the shadow of steep slopes -- or in the streets of New 
> York. -- I appreciate any additional advice, and hope that this experience 
> can save Steve's organisation some money...
>
> Best,
> Maria
>
>
>
>> Am 23.05.2020 um 03:54 schrieb Stephen Sacks <[email protected]>:
>>
>> In order to make widely available some wise advice, I'm sending to this list 
>> a message I received from Neil B.  In addition to Neil's message below, I 
>> want to mention that Nicolas Cadieux also provided similar information, 
>> saying I'd have to pay around $1,000 for equipment that gives consistently 
>> accurate location coordinates.  And thanks, also to Falk Huettmann and Bernd 
>> Vogelgesang for their replies.
>>
>>
>> Message from Neil B:
>>
>> Hello Stephen.
>> Glad that you're having success. I would like to start off by saying that it 
>> is best to always reply to the mailing list and not directly to the person 
>> who submitted the email. Mailing lists work really well in that there is a 
>> pool of people out there who may be able to offer advice or may have an 
>> alternate method to solve the problem that may turn out to be a better way. 
>> On the flip side by maintaining the email chain through the mailing list, 
>> the follow up emails that provide information are stored in the archives 
>> which benefits anyone searching the internet to have the complete trail of 
>> information.
>>
>> As far as your results they are acceptable for the device you're using. GPS 
>> in phones are never built to precision survey standards and there is no 
>> reason for them to be. If you're within 30ft of where the phone thinks you 
>> should be then you can easily navigate the rest of the way by visual sight. 
>> High end equipment to achieve sub-inch accuracy is probably in the range of 
>> thousands of dollars. One thing to keep in mind is there is a difference 
>> between the accuracy of a device and to what level of precision they 
>> display. While the app on the phone may display 8 decimal places of a 
>> lat/long coordinate and tell you if you have moved a foot, it doesn't help 
>> that the coordinate it is displaying is out +/- 30 feet. The accuracy of a 
>> device can also be affected by the environment where the device is being 
>> operated. In regards to cell phones, they use multiple sources to determine 
>> location such as GPS, cell phone towers, and wifi points to perform the 
>> triangulation. Lack of line of sight to satellites, signals from cell towers 
>> bouncing off of surrounding buildings, or someone's wireless router using 
>> inaccurate position information can all affect the accuracy of what is being 
>> displayed on your phone.
>>
>> So the question is how are you determining that the coordinates are wrong? 
>> If you have information that you trust to be authoritative then adjust your 
>> points to those values and carry on. I have no advice or opinions on 
>> inexpensive devices that may help with a more accurate reading.
>>
>> Please do not respond directly to me. This email account is not actively 
>> monitored and I don't always have the time to follow up with the emails. All 
>> the best with your endeavours.
>>
>> ~Neil B.
>>
>> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 7:52 PM Stephen Sacks <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hi Neil,
>>
>>     With your help, I have successfully brought the corners of our gardens 
>> back from Pennsylvania to the Promenade here in Brooklyn Heights, New York.  
>> Thank you.
>>     At the risk of wearing out my welcome, I'm now asking for more advice.  
>> My point features are approximately where they should be but not exactly, 
>> some points are just a few feet off and some are 10 or even 30 feet off.  I 
>> imported the data trying both EPSG 4326 and 4269.
>>     I'm now convinced that the problem is due to (1) my Google Pixel 3 
>> cellphone, (2) the app I'm using ("Latitude Longitude" published by 
>> gps-coordinates), and  especially (3) my less-than-steady hands.  I capture 
>> coordinates by standing at spot, waiting for the blue dot to settle, and 
>> then touching the blue dot.  Often I don't touch the screen at exactly the 
>> right place.  I tried another app ("GPS Coordinates" published by Financept) 
>> which is better in that it allows me to zoom in, but I'm still not always 
>> getting it right.
>>    I'm thinking now that I need specialized equipment.  That is what I want 
>> to ask you.  Can you recommend some inexpensive device that will allow me to 
>> simply press a button to record accurately the coordinates of the point 
>> where I'm standing?  Keep in mind that this is a community project with no 
>> funding.  I live on Social Security and a university pension, but I'm 
>> willing to pay something in the range of $50 or a bit more.  Do you know of 
>> anything at such a modest price, or would I have to pay much more?  Or 
>> perhaps you know of better software for my Android Pixel 3 phone.
>>       Thanks in advance for any advice you might offer.
>>                    Steve
>>      
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Qgis-user mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-user mailing list
> [email protected]
> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user

--
Randal Hale
[email protected]
(p) 423.653.3611
http://www.northrivergeographic.com


_______________________________________________
Qgis-user mailing list
[email protected]
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user

_______________________________________________
Qgis-user mailing list
[email protected]
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user

Reply via email to