Hi, trying the rendering of a raster floating point using the cumulative count cut. I see it is quite good if I set the values 2.0,100.0% (not 98%) and use the accuracy at value "estimate". Instead always with the same values for cumulative count cut, but using the accuracy "actual". The result is really poor. The image became totally black with only few isles of grey.
This is a surprise for me because the accuracy "actual" take a long time and the name seem to say more precision. I like to know what is the strategy used for actual: estimate and the strategy for accuracy: actual. Many thx. -- ----------------- Andrea Peri . . . . . . . . . qwerty àèìòù ----------------- _______________________________________________ Qgis-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
