HI Nyall, Thank you for the status update and your work!
Question: do you still prefer the skipping of one release and then release of QGIS 4.0 in February 2026? Just to be clear on this. Thank you for your reply, Andreas On Wed, 3 Sept 2025 at 00:30, Nyall Dawson via QGIS-PSC < [email protected]> wrote: > > > On Mon, 25 Aug 2025 at 11:47, Nyall Dawson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Sat, 23 Aug 2025 at 19:35, Mathieu Pellerin via QGIS-PSC > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > With regards to the timeline question raised by Marco in this thread, > I'd like to add a +1 to the idea of postponing QGIS 4.0. At the very least, > I think we should make a conscious decision about it sooner than later :) > > > > I'm also +1 to deferring QGIS 4.0 for one release cycle. (ie skip > > October's release, and release 4.0 in February). > > > > The CI port to Qt 6 is basically ready now (at > > https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/62809). However -- there's still a > > handful of tests which pass under Qt 5 which are skipped on the Qt 6 > > builds right now, and this makes me nervous. If we merged #62809 today > > and moved exclusively to Qt 6 then we'll lose some test coverage. I'd > > prefer to hold off merging #62809 until we can get these remaining > > tests passing on the ubuntu qt6 builds. > > > Status update: we've now moved ALL of testing CI to Qt 6! 🥳 All tests > which were passing on qt 5 are now passing on qt 6, and a handful of > underlying issues which were breaking these remaining tests have been fixed. > > Nyall > _______________________________________________ > QGIS-PSC mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc > -- -- Andreas Neumann QGIS.ORG board member (treasurer)
_______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list [email protected] List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
