Hi Jean,
Thank you for your work and for bringing this up.

We discussed your proposal at the recent PSC meeting. We agreed that while
fixing these Qt6-related unit tests is indeed essential, there’s no need
for a special, separate funding initiative. Instead, we consider this
effort to fall within the scope of the regular bug fixing round (starting
next week), albeit with an extended timeframe and budget allocation given
the scale of the Qt6 transition.

Andreas will note this in the mail to the devs participating in the
bugfixing round.

Cheers Marco

On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 at 14:56, Jean Felder via QGIS-PSC <
qgis-...@lists.osgeo.org> wrote:

> Dear PSC and contributors,
>
> Benoît, Julien and I have been working recently on fixing some unit
> tests which don't work on the Qt6 version at the moment: the unit tests
> listed in `test_blocklist_qt6.txt`
> (https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/blob/master/.ci/test_blocklist_qt6.txt)
> and the unit tests that fail on CI when running with Fedora 41 or 42.
> For example, see:
>
>   - https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/61483
>   - https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/61537
>   - https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/61492
>   - https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/61668
>   - https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/61425
>   - https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/61466
>
> This work was based on some internal funding from our employer, Oslandia.
> However, fixing those unit tests and issues can take a lot of time. We
> would like to keep working on it but we have exhausted this funding.
>
> In less than 6 months, QGIS official release 4.0 will be based on Qt 6,
> and we think this is a matter of importance to fix all the remaining non
> working tests, including the one in `test_blocklist_qt6.txt`.
> We also think that it should be a collective effort from people
> contributing to QGIS on regular basis.
>
> Could it be possible to set up a dedicated QGIS funding initiative,
> similar to the existing mechanisms used for bug fixing so regular
> contributors could participate in fixing those tests. That would maybe
> require to coordinate effort so contributors don't work on fixing the
> same test.
>
> Regards,
>
> Julien and Jean
>
> _______________________________________________
> QGIS-PSC mailing list
> qgis-...@lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>


-- 
Marco Bernasocchi

QGIS.org Chair
OSGEO.org VP Europe
OPENGIS.ch CEO
http://berna.io
_______________________________________________
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Reply via email to