Even Rouault via QGIS-Developer <qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org> writes:
> I also believe verisonning Qt6 QGIS builds as 4.0 is the right thing > to do for clarity and from a semantic versioning point of view. This I am somewhat sympathetic, but am having trouble following. Right now, as I understand it, the qgis sources can be build with qt5 or qt6. Yet that is the same version number, and the API as seen by plugins is different. Are you suggesting that the same sources have a different version number expressed in "qgis --version" and recommended for binary package naming, depending on how they are built? Or are you suggesting changing the qgis version number to 4.0, and simultaneously changing the build instructions to say that one SHOULD build with qt6, and building with qt5 results in a defective build (because it doesn't meet the plugin API that's part of 4) and therefore SHOULD NOT be distributed? Essentially, that a specific qgis future branch be declared as qt6 only, while branches before are qt5 only (even if both can be compiled either way)? _______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
