Hi, I confirm it's completely about forgetting. When I backported in 3.16 (queued ltr backports), I believed the backport in 3.22 was already done which was not the case. Thank you for fixing this.
Kind regards, Julien > Hi Olivier, > > Yes, backporting to 3.16 implies backport to 3.22. And I think the PR you > point here is more about forgetting. The PR itself is opened during 3.22.0 > dev cycle and merged few days after release, so easier to forget to add the > label. > And the list of missing PRs should actually be > https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pulls?q=is%3Apr+label%3A%22backport+queued_ltr_backports%22+-label%3A%22backport+release-3_22%22+merged%3A%3E2021-10-21 > since anything merged before 22/10/2021 is automatically in 3.22. Finally, > there's no that much leftover PRs, so I think everybody is OK with your > logic. > > Regards, > Harrissou > > Le jeu. 9 déc. 2021 à 15:29, Olivier Dalang <[email protected]> a > écrit : > >> Hi all ! >> >> There's something I don't completely understand with the current >> branches/releases process and which to me looks like a major issue (came >> across it while checking the status of a recently merged bugfix PR#45521 >> <https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/45521>). >> >> That fix was merged to master with the `backport queued_ltr_backports` >> label, but without `backport release-3_22`. >> >> As far as I understand, this means it will be available in 3.24 (master) >> and in 3.16 (after some quarantine), but not in 3.22. Still if I understand >> correctly, 3.22 is our future LTR, meaning that LTR users will at some >> point upgrade from 3.16 to 3.22. Does that mean that the bug they have seen >> fixed in 3.16 will be reintroduced in 3.22 ? >> >> The following filter shows many other PRs backported to 3.16 but not 3.22 : >> is:pr label:"backport queued_ltr_backports" -label:"backport release-3_22" >> <https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pulls?q=is%3Apr+label%3A%22backport+queued_ltr_backports%22+-label%3A%22backport+release-3_22%22> >> (same >> search should also be done with label `backport release-3_16`) >> >> Shouldn't backporting to 3.16 always imply backporting to 3.22 ? Or am I >> missing something ? >> >> Cheers ! >> >> Olivier >> _______________________________________________ >> QGIS-Developer mailing list >> [email protected] >> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >> > _______________________________________________ > QGIS-Developer mailing list > [email protected] > List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer _______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list [email protected] List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
