I've no strong opinion in favor or against... for sure I result maintainer for some plugins that where developed under a "company" environment. The company should be in charge to maintain that. Anyone want to hire a developer that have knowledge of the plugin can use git log to find who worked on that.
so +1 Luigi Pirelli ************************************************************************************************** * LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/luigipirelli * Stackexchange: http://gis.stackexchange.com/users/19667/luigi-pirelli * GitHub: https://github.com/luipir * Mastering QGIS 2nd Edition: * https://www.packtpub.com/big-data-and-business-intelligence/mastering-qgis-second-edition * Hire me: http://goo.gl/BYRQKg ************************************************************************************************** On 12 May 2018 at 00:16, Nyall Dawson <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like to float this idea of dropping this list of code maintainers > from the website: > > https://www.qgis.org/en/site/getinvolved/governance/governance.html#code- > maintainers > > Rationale: > > - It's not really relevant anymore - most areas of code are "shared > responsibilities" > - It's horribly outdated, including developers who are no longer > actively involved in the project and missing lots of the most active > developers (e.g. compare to the list at > https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/graphs/contributors !) > - PRs aren't assigned based on this list - rather they are "self > assigned" by interested developers. > > Any objections? > Nyall
_______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list [email protected] List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
