Hi all, my perception is that, although niche, thi is however largely used. The problem is that it is difficult to reach these users, so a crowdfunding widely annouced through blogs and social media could be a good way to go. I suspect these users will quitely keep on using 2.18, which IMHO is suboptimal. Thanks Howard for raising this issue. All the best.
Il 23/04/2018 07:21, Howard Frederick ha scritto: > Hi all - > > QGIS 3 is pretty magical* but I miss the R provider! We have a bunch of > R scripts for our flightplanning and mapmaking wildlife work that were > super handy and will be sorely missed. > > I don’t have the Python skills to port the 2.18 plugin to 3.0 (yet!) but > would be interested in (a) trying to get some crowdfunding going and (b) > helping to coordinate an effort to get the R provider going again. > > … that is, IF there is enough interest! Please respond here or ping me > privately and we’ll see how much of a community we have. > > Cheers - > > Howard Frederick > > Conservation biologist / Wildlife survey > www.underdiverwaterman.com <http://www.underdiverwaterman.com> > > > > *HUGE thanks to everyone making this possible, not least of which > to William Kyngesburye for making the Mac installers available. > > > _______________________________________________ > QGIS-Developer mailing list > [email protected] > List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > -- Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu QGIS & PostGIS courses: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html https://www.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&geo=IT&q=qgis,arcgis _______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list [email protected] List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
