Ok, it is clear now. Should I commit this change to release-3_0 and master branches right now?
2018-02-24 13:25 GMT+02:00 matteo <[email protected]>: > Hi Alex, > > >> well, previously it worked in the exactly this way, link was created >> using algorithm id which eventually is a concatenation of the provider >> name and algorithm name. But on requrest from documentation team >> this behaviour was changed to current approach. >> >> So now you want to go back to links like this >> >> https://docs.qgis.org/testing/en/docs/user_manual/processing_algs/qgis/vectoroverlay.html#qgisintersection >> >> Is this correct? Just want to clarify before implemeting it to avoid yet >> another >> round of discussions and "fixing". > > according with Richard, we think that having the link > > https://docs.qgis.org/testing/en/docs/user_manual/processing_algs/qgis/vectoroverlay.html#qgisintersection > > so provider name concatenated with algorithm name is the way to go. To > avoid any other future issues with hyphens vs underscores etc I think it > is smart to have a single string like `qgiscountpointsinpolygon` instead > of `qgis_countpointsinpolygon`. > > This way the name of the algorithm should be always unique even among > providers. > > I'm sorry that we did not face these issues before, but nobody thought > we can have this sphinx troubles with anchors. > > > Thanks Alex for taking care of this > > Cheers > > Matteo -- Alexander Bruy _______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list [email protected] List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
