Hi all, thanks for this question. I confirm that the choice is subjective, done by the many people included in the staff of plugin management. As pointed out, this has been neglected in recent times. I'd welcome any suggestion on plugins to include in or remove from the list. One related issue is how to give more emphasis on user ratings: this could be a useful guide for others, but has been underutilized, and not prominently exposed. Ideas and contributions on this also welcomed. All the best.
Il 30/01/2018 19:26, Tom Chadwin ha scritto: > It's a list manually curated by the devs. The idea is that there are lots of > other objective stats on the plugins website to give people quantitative > data about different plugins, so this is some kind of qualitative judgement. > > That said, I guess the list needs consideration. Should plugins only > available for QGIS 2 be in the list, once QGIS 3 has been launched? > > Tom > > > > ----- > Buy Pie Spy: Adventures in British pastry 2010-11 on Amazon > -- > Sent from: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/QGIS-Developer-f4099106.html > _______________________________________________ > QGIS-Developer mailing list > [email protected] > List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > -- Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu QGIS & PostGIS courses: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html https://www.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&geo=IT&q=qgis,arcgis _______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list [email protected] List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
