On 7 December 2017 at 03:16, Borys Jurgiel <li...@borysjurgiel.pl> wrote: > Coming back to your question, Saber... It's no pleasure to drop stuff someone > spent a lot of time on, but yes, personally +1 for going on.
Mmmm... I'd honestly hope that we don't have that reaction when dropping code. Every contribution shapes the future codebase, so all the work done in globe has helped set the direction and framework for the new 3d stuff. Code churn is natural in a project of this size, and doesn't reflect lack of value in anyone's past contributions. > Is anybody here using Globe at all? I don't -- purely because the build dependencies have never been satisfied on my OS of choice. However - I don't think removing it is an option until we have feature parity here, and I'd be reluctant to remove it even then before having the Qt based 3d stuff exposed to the wider testing of being included in a stable release. Martin - do you have a checklist of features in globe which still require porting to QGIS 3d? Nyall _______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
