It seems we find a consensus here? Richard are you ok with this:* create
release-2_18 branch* adapt features tracker if needed* made release-2_18 branch
the default one* forward porting by contributor or by alexandre
I can't do this before the end of the week as I am on trip for QGIS training.
Could someone create the branch?
Sorry if I am too fast to conclude. Feel free to give your opinion if necessary.
Thanks.
Y.
Envoyé depuis mon appareil Samsung
-------- Message d'origine --------
De : DelazJ <[email protected]>
Date : 06/03/2017 15:26 (GMT+01:00)
À : Matthias Kuhn <[email protected]>
Cc : qgis-developer <[email protected]>
Objet : Re: [Qgis-developer] 3.0 Documentation and branching
2017-03-06 15:20 GMT+01:00 Matthias Kuhn <[email protected]>:
Sorry, I explained badly. Pull requests are perfectly fine and desirable
and should be the standard way to contribute for everyone (including
devs). What I wanted to say is that commits (and therefore pull
requests) are preferable over issues because they are written in rst and
not md, unlike issues.
I can't disagree this time!
Matthias
_______________________________________________
Qgis-developer mailing list
[email protected]
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
