Ok, done:
https://github.com/qgis/qgis3_UIX_discussion
@Alexandre, can you please check if you can add/edit issues now? Without
giving you commit rights?
Then if that is ok (and everybody can at least create issues) I give you
commit rights so you can close issues.
Let's see if this works!
Regards,
Richard
On 02-12-16 09:47, Alexandre Neto wrote:
Richard,
Thanks!
I can do the gardening.
Alex Neto
A sex, 2/12/2016, 08:45, Richard Duivenvoorde <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> escreveu:
On 01-12-16 19:48, Nyall Dawson wrote:
>
>
> On 1 Dec 2016 11:28 PM, "DelazJ" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Apologies if I misread some comments above but I'm afraid we are
> moving from what Alexandre was mentionning in his first post
(in any
> case, the way I understood it): add consistency to the
features QGIS
> already provide (and among those features). While I'm also
> interested in some requests (such as "bad layers handling" - I
like
> the way InDesign manage broken links), I wonder if this kind of
> request should not be kept for the hub as it's a new feature.
>
> Richard mentioned a place where 3.0 requests were listed. Is
it this
> one https://github.com/qgis/qgis3.0_api/
> <https://github.com/qgis/qgis3.0_api/> ? While it's supposed to be
> api oriented, maybe we can extend it and allow to list/discuss and
> filter (in a more organized way) all UI/UX thingies that worth
a fix
> before 3.0 lands.
> In this way, anyone that wants to help can pick an issue and ask
> pointers from devs if/when needed.
>
>
> I'm not a fan of mixing the two. Maybe a new repo could be made
for 3.0
> ui suggestions, but just like this thread it's going to get filled
with
> a thousand unrelated feature requests ;)
>
> The api repo is a nice clean list of stuff that HAS to be done before
> 3.0 release or we miss the opportunity. Ui can always be addressed
in a
> future 3.x release.
Ok, what about the following:
- I create an Repo: https://github.com/qgis/qgis3.0_UIX solely for the
creation/discussion of ideas as tickets?
'Some people' have to do some gardening there then, like cleaning up
duplicates etc. Volunteers for that? I can give you on that repo then.
Regards,
Richard Duivenvoorde
_______________________________________________
Qgis-developer mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
--
Alexandre Neto
---------------------
@AlexNetoGeo
http://sigsemgrilhetas.wordpress.com
http://gisunchained.wordpress.com
_______________________________________________
Qgis-developer mailing list
[email protected]
List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
_______________________________________________
Qgis-developer mailing list
[email protected]
List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
