On 8 October 2016 at 22:13, Anita Graser <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 8:14 AM, Neumann, Andreas <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> Now, the documentation items: >> >> 1) 2.16 Documentation >> >> 16) PyQGIS Developer Cookbook update and maintenance >> >> 15) PyQGIS Cookbook Review >> > > Do we already have a plan how to proceed with the documentation items? I'd > suggest a focus on LTR docs for end users as well as PyQGIS. What do you > think?
really hard to decide about LTR PyQGIS... probably a community poll can be useful with a (short term) discussion. My reason to explain why it is hard to decide are: 1) I would invest and push developer to dev and port 3.0 plugins 2) pyqgis dev knowledge is almost covered also by StackExchange... I agree that wouldn't be the way to document, but we are facing transition to 3 3) LTR will will terminate afgter 3.0 release and it's documentation will become strongly obsolete with 3.0 transition. For this reason I wouldn't invest in ltr pyqgis doc. Luigi Pirelli ************************************************************************************************** * Boundless QGIS Support/Development: lpirelli AT boundlessgeo DOT com * LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/luigipirelli * Stackexchange: http://gis.stackexchange.com/users/19667/luigi-pirelli * GitHub: https://github.com/luipir * Mastering QGIS: https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/mastering-qgis ************************************************************************************************** _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
