Hi Alessandro,
I'm working with my colleague David on the QEP about new server
architecture.
Regards,
Le 25/09/2016 à 10:06, Alessandro Pasotti a écrit :
Hi,
I'm glad that Matthias's semi-serious threats to remove the server
from source tree and Nyall's complaints have shaken the souls of the
server people!
I insist that the server remains a first class citizen and a full
featured tool within the QGIS project, but I understand that it should
not be a brake for the core refactoring ,slowing down the amazing
development that QGIS dev team is doing on the core and gui libraries.
I've just started a small WIP contribution aimed to solve a first
issue (https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/3528).
I wonder what would be the better way to coordinate the efforts, gain
in efficience and avoid duplication.
This is a possible roadmap (suggestions welcome!):
- start a QEP for the new server architecture (C++ plugins for the
core services etc.) (@rldhont, can you take care of this?)
- a list of prioritized issues (on the qgis hub?, on github? no idea
here) ( @nyall, @mkuhn: you know the new and old API very well, if
you could start creating a list of must-have, should-have,
nice-to-have issues it would be very helpful)
- create a formal (but completely open) dedicated team of developers
and assign issues
- possibly, meet periodically to coordinate the development
Am I dreaming?
--
Alessandro Pasotti
w3: www.itopen.it <http://www.itopen.it>
_______________________________________________
Qgis-developer mailing list
[email protected]
List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
