Hi,
On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 12:00 AM, Nyall Dawson <[email protected]> wrote: > On 5 September 2016 at 15:51, Matthias Kuhn <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi > > > > On 09/05/2016 07:06 AM, Nyall wrote: > > > I was just digging in to the new build errors for the OSX Travis > builds, > > > and was led to this discussion: > > > > > > https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew-core/issues/4365 > > > > > > My understanding is that this is game over for the Qt4 homebrew builds. > > > Am I mistaken here? > > > > > > If so - is it time to "call it" and kill Qt4 support in master? I was > > > hoping to get all the unit tests passing under the Travis Qt5 builds > > > first but am now wondering if that's just needlessly prolonging things. > > > Some of the current blacklist could be much easier to address if we > > > don't need to care about backward compatibility. > > > > What's the connection between having Qt4 support in the code and > > shipping Qt5 builds on Mac? > > I explained that badly - I was thinking mostly about what the fastest > way to get some supported osx version back up and running again is. If > i'm understanding the implications of that homebrew issue correctly, > there's now no way of building master (or even 2.16) on osx. > I have been working on this for ~ a day. Later today and throughout next week I will be working on a resolution for these issues. Sorry for the delay. Larry Shaffer Dakota Cartography Black Hills, South Dakota > Which lead in a roundabout way to thinking about the quickest way to > resolve the remaining qt5 test failures and how to avoid spending > *any* more wasted minutes on qt4 compatibility ;) > > Nyall > > > > > > > > > I don't mind too much dropping Qt4 support. So far I didn't see any > > reason to do it and thought there are more urgent issues where time can > > be invested (having mac builds for 2.16, having Qt5 mac builds, having > > Qt5 Windows builds, sorting out API issues...). If you say that there > > are blacklisted tests (or other things) which can be resolved easier > > without Qt4, I think we should just proceed. > > > > Matthias > > > > > > > > Nyall > > > > > > > > > > > > <http://north-road.com> *North Road* > > > Cartography • Development • Spatial Analysis > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > ------------ > > > *north-road.com* <http://north-road.com> > > > <https://twitter.com/northroadgeo><https://www. > facebook.com/North-Road-997236690392419/home><https:// > www.linkedin.com/company/north-road-studios><https://plus.google.com/b/ > 108321726558543789406> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Qgis-developer mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > > > Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Qgis-developer mailing list > > [email protected] > > List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > > Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > [email protected] > List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >
_______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
