Hi Arnaud,
I would like add two things to (the end of) your list:
* Have a way to add icons to the algorithms
* Improve (and translate) algorithms' documentation
Bernhard
Am 14.09.2015 um 10:30 schrieb Arnaud Morvan:
Normally, I would be present at next hackfest and interested in working
on this.
From my point of view, the task would be:
* Create a customizable vector menu based on Processing like proposed
by Victor at Nodebo
* List fTools menu entries, with candidates Processing algorithms, and
differences that need to be solved.
* Porting algorithms that has not yet been ported
* Complete some algorithms with new parameters or createcustom dialogs
close to fTools ones when need.
* Get processing plugin fully translated (already working on this)
Arnaud
Le 11/09/2015 13:53, Victor Olaya a écrit :
I think Arnaud also raised the question sometime ago (my fault for not
commenting on that at the time...), and it should be easy to add those
shortcuts, but I haven't had much time lately for working on
Processing.
I wont be attending the next Hackfest, but sounds like a task that can
be accomplished in those days, and I will be happy to help remotely or
take it completely and try to develop a subsystem in Processing to
customize the menus and toolbars with Processing algorithms.
Hope this helps
2015-09-11 12:52 GMT+02:00 Paolo Cavallini<[email protected]>:
Il 11/09/2015 11:29, kimaidou ha scritto:
+1 for this !
Hi all,
thanks for raising this point, IMHO a serious one. I'm very much in
favour of removing redundancy. In this case, however, I think we better
be careful before removing fTools, because:
* people are used to it, and for one-shot analyses it is (slightly)
easier to run than Processing (weak argument)
* we do not have enough development resources to make Processing
bulletproof, particularly for 3rd party backends; therefore, we
encounter occasional problems, and we cannot guarantee a smooth user
experience in all cases (strong argument).
First issue can be solved, as suggested, by adding menu shortcuts to
Processing analyses, to mimic existing situation.
Second one is more serious: IMHO we really need a dedicated developer in
this area: any power user (=larger institutions) are willing to take it?
Similar things may be said for GDALTools.
All the best.
--
Paolo Cavallini -www.faunalia.eu
QGIS & PostGIS courses:http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html
_______________________________________________
Qgis-developer mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
_______________________________________________
Qgis-developer mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
__________ Information from ESET Mail Security, version of virus signature
database 12248 (20150914) __________
The message was checked by ESET Mail Security.
http://www.eset.com
_______________________________________________
Qgis-developer mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
