+1 for RFC, since universally understood.
Regards,
Marco
On 02.09.2014 15:01, Larry Shaffer wrote:
Hi,
I need to start using the new QEP/RFC setup (today actually),
specifically for some sponsored work. I don't want the sponsor to
think the QGIS project is indecisive, so I propose a vote on the
naming of the process, since there is some disagreement.
QEP or RFC?
+0 for QEP (I'm fine with RFC, as well).
I think RFC is a bit dry, though universally understood. QEP should
not confuse the public, since the dev group actually interested in
using them is fairly small. QEP is clearly spelled out in the repo
name. QEP shows a renewed configuration over the older, existing RFC
process.
Lastly, QEP pays homage to Python's PEP. I think QGIS would not be as
popular as it is today if it were not for Python integration.
Regards,
Larry Shaffer
Dakota Cartography
Black Hills, South Dakota
_______________________________________________
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
--
Dr. Marco Hugentobler
Sourcepole - Linux & Open Source Solutions
Weberstrasse 5, CH-8004 Zürich, Switzerland
marco.hugentob...@sourcepole.ch http://www.sourcepole.ch
Technical Advisor QGIS Project Steering Committee
_______________________________________________
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
