hello again :) i still think in which direction i should work. it may be exactly SEXTANTE or it may be some qgis plugins, for example: HPGL, Orfeo toolbox (which already working via processingframework) , some algirithms from grass (ACCA, TOAR and etc). and apparently they will run via the SEXTANTE (it have more votes than processingframework). it is necessary to define a list of plugins that you would like to see in qgis?
26 марта 2012 г. 17:23 пользователь Anne Ghisla <[email protected]> написал: > On Sun, 25 Mar 2012 21:22:30 +0200 > Tim Sutton <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi >> >> 2012/3/25 Сергей Бастраков <[email protected]>: >> > Hello! >> > If I understand correctly, then SEXTANTE more likely to stay than >> > the ProcessingFramework. But what about ideas for gsoc? I originally >> > planned to work on the framework. in particular, add HPGL, my >> > implementation of the ACCA algorithm and work on the framework >> > itself. >> >> ACCA and other RS tools would be a nice addition to QGIS! > > Sergei, all, > > I also support the integration with HPGL and ACCA. > Are you willing to work on SEXTANTE Python version as well? If so, > please coordinate with Arumozhi, so that you write two independent > proposals. There is enough work to do for two students! > I'd also ask Victor if he manages to mentor two students, maybe with > the help of co-mentors. > > Best, > > Anne > -- > http://gis.cri.fmach.it/ghisla/ > > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
