2012/3/26 Sandro Santilli <[email protected]> > On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 02:18:15PM +0200, G. Allegri wrote: > > 2012/3/26 Carson Farmer <[email protected]> > > > > > Keep in mind it is only a problem if you plan on distributing your > > > plugin... if it is just for internal use then I wouldn't worry about > > > it :-p > > > > Well, it's for a customer, so it could be an issue... > > I totally respect the choice of the developers to use a GPL license, but > I > > agree that an LGPL would cause lesser headaches to support > > interoperability... > > Have your customer pay the pills for those headaches / bills for those > requirements. Make them aware of how they are hurting themselves by relying > on proprietary software. >
I still have to sell it :) It was just a test for interoperability management. As usual, Sandro, it there was the chance to do everything with free software I would have already suggested it :) giovanni > > --strk; > > ,------o-. > | __/ | Delivering high quality PostGIS 2.0 ! > | / 2.0 | http://strk.keybit.net - http://vizzuality.com > `-o------' > >
_______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
