> after endless emails we agreed on > > * all plugins should have a public issue tracker > * all plugins should should a SNV/GIT core repository > * all plugins should have a public homepage > > this means that if the author doesn't supply those informations a > warning (not an error!) is issued by the plugins app. Only staff > members and authors see the warnings. The warning says: > > "Some important informations are missing from the plugin metadata > (homepage, tracker or repository). Please consider creating a project > on hub.qgis.org and filling the missing metadata." > > this is a suggestion, not an order, if the red color of the text > disturbs you, we can easily change, also, if you have some proposals > on a better message, please let us know. >
Hi Ale I like very much the approach of the plugin Django application, so I really hope that the QGIS developers community will stick with it. A very nice add-on you could easily implement isre a comment system, by using the django-threadedcomments. I also recommend you to give a look to the OpenComparison project [1], the platform on which the DjangoPackages portal [2] (and other ones) is based: there are very good ideas all around there, specially the integration with the APIs provided by PyPI, Github, BitBucket, Launchpad, and SourceForge ;) Thanks again for your excellent work! P [1] http://opencomparison.readthedocs.org/en/latest/index.html [2] http://djangopackages.com/ -- Paolo Corti Geospatial software developer web: http://www.paolocorti.net twitter: @capooti skype: capooti _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
