On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 10:05 PM Phil Dennis-Jordan <li...@philjordan.eu> wrote: > > I think fd and the HVF type should be placed in an anonymous union. > > Taking a look at the code and thinking through the implications, I'm > not actually sure what the intention of the union is
Nevermind, I got confused that AccelCPUState depends on what the actual accelerator is. So yeah, you can just change the type of "fd"; it was an int only because in the past the field was defined for all accelerators. Paolo
