On Fri, 13 Oct 2023 11:46:42 +0300
Emmanouil Pitsidianakis <manos.pitsidiana...@linaro.org> wrote:

> In preparation of raising -Wimplicit-fallthrough to 5, replace all
> fall-through comments with the fallthrough attribute pseudo-keyword.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Emmanouil Pitsidianakis <manos.pitsidiana...@linaro.org>

Looking at this, I think the code in question needs a closer look, cleanup
but that has nothing to do with what you are doing here!

Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.came...@huawei.com>
> ---
>  hw/cxl/cxl-device-utils.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/cxl/cxl-device-utils.c b/hw/cxl/cxl-device-utils.c
> index bd68328032..63f009847e 100644
> --- a/hw/cxl/cxl-device-utils.c
> +++ b/hw/cxl/cxl-device-utils.c
> @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ static void mailbox_mem_writel(uint32_t *reg_state, hwaddr 
> offset,
>  {
>      switch (offset) {
>      case A_CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_CTRL:
> -        /* fallthrough */
> +        fallthrough;
>      case A_CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_CAP:
>          /* RO register */
>          break;
> @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ static void mailbox_mem_writeq(uint64_t *reg_state, 
> hwaddr offset,
>          break;
>      case A_CXL_DEV_BG_CMD_STS:
>          /* BG not supported */
> -        /* fallthrough */
> +        fallthrough;
>      case A_CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_STS:
>          /* Read only register, will get updated by the state machine */
>          return;


Reply via email to